Autism and NIDS Treatments - Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRI’s)

The only medical agent out there that’s routinely available and directly seems to help the temporal lobe are called the SSRIs, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors. The drugs that come under this category are Prozac, Paxil and Zoloft. What these drugs do is, for the first time, work on a specific pathway in the brain. They block the reuptake of the serotonin released.

If the serotonin released “stays around longer / more effectively,” part of the brain works better. Prozac may also alter part of the “neuro-immune” axis, working to increase blood flow and function in the temporal lobe. This increased blood flow and improved function of the temporal lobes, helps many behavioral and processing problems in these “autistic” children. By helping restore and preserve temporal lobe function, one may be helping maintain a healthier brain.

Importantly, this is not an effort to control the children with medicine. A very small dose, usually 2-4 mg, is used with a four or five year old. If controlling a child’s behavior was the goal, a dose of 10 - 20 mg would be used. Instead all that is needed to help function in the brain is a very small (but consistent) dose.

The purpose of using these drugs is an effort to get a child’s brain to work better. In the past, if you talked about an antidepressant you were thinking Valium, Librium, Phenobarbital, that’s how you “calmed” someone down. That’s not what you’re doing with Prozac, Paxil or Zoloft.

Pharmaceutical companies are trying to design drugs that will help the brain more physiologically than the agents out there did before. SSRI’s represent the first of new “designer” drugs, with the capability of acting physiologically within the brain.

These drugs can help a child medically to function better. They help transmitter effect and likely increase blood flow to the area of the brain that was not functioning properly before. And if the brain starts working, the results with these children can be phenomenal. These children are usually extremely bright. (Note: While capable of helping medically, this author believes strongly that one cannot judge their positive effects, avoiding negatives at low dosages, without controlling / combining diet and other steps at the same time.)

Michael J. Goldberg M.D., F.A.A.P.
Avalar Medical Group, Inc.
5620 Wilbur Avenue, Suite 318
Tarzana, Claifornia 91356
Telephone (818) 343-1010
Fax (818) 343-6585

Pediatrics & Young Adults
ADHD/ADD-Learning Disabilities,
Immune Dysfunction Autism

Source: adhd

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

Immune Modulating Agents for Autism and NIDS

There are agents that have already been tested and developed, and are now undergoing new usage’s testing in adults that will let us adjust the immune system. Hopefully, they will have the ability to fine tune the body and put the immune system back on track. These drugs are already in existence, but are available only through appropriate research protocols. They could potentially correct all of the processing problems associated with autism (and possibly other childhood learning disorders) where “immune-mediated.”

The trouble is, children are the last in line. Even though trials are now starting for adults, no agency wants to test children. The liability is too much. It is only after you’ve proven things extensively in adults that treatment for a child is even considered. If medicine follows its usual course of action, trials for children would be at least another four or five years away.

That is too long to wait. We must find a way to make this happen sooner. Even if the agents are identified that will “normalize” function or stop abnormalities from occurring in autistic children, these agents must be used before children pass important functional and developmental steps that might not be regained if these agents are administered later in life. Funding for this research is of the utmost importance. We can not lose children to autism, who have the potential to lead a normal life.

Even in older children, it appears parts of the brain can be helped significantly. If cognitive function improves, the “equation” for the future changes. But, educators, therapists must start thinking “rehabilitation” rather than just “training.” Often it is extremely slow and difficult to sort out compounding behavioral issues ( perhaps after so many years of being bright but frustrated and dysfunctional secondary to the non-working parts of the brain).

Michael J. Goldberg M.D., F.A.A.P.
Avalar Medical Group, Inc.
5620 Wilbur Avenue, Suite 318
Tarzana, Claifornia 91356
Telephone (818) 343-1010
Fax (818) 343-6585

Pediatrics & Young Adults
ADHD/ADD-Learning Disabilities,
Immune Dysfunction Autism

Source: autism

NCLEX- Nursing Test Harder To Pass Or Are There More Demands On Students?

You can pass the NCLEX RN the first time! There are many students that pass the test on their initial attempt. When you take the time to determine how you are going to approach your studies, you can too! Only 87.1% of US trained pupils and 47.4% of students educated abroad passed the NCLEX in the first quarter of 2008. This is down 2% and 10% for US and internationally educated students compared to the first quarter of 2007 according to the NCSBN. At first glance this statistic could be a bit disheartening, but when analyzing the numbers as a whole they are curious. Here are some interesting statistics .

US Educated Students- First Time NCLEX TestTakers 2007:

First Quarter- 26,923 Candidates 89.1% % Pass Rate

Second Quarter- 31,379 Candidates 87.6% Pass Rate

Third Quarter- 51,428 Candidates 83.5% Pass Rate

Forth Quarter- 9.849 Candidates 78.6% Pass Rate

The passing percentages vary tremendously between the quarters. Does the test administered differ that much from one quarter to the next? It is not likely that the NCSBN is making changes that will cause a variance of this degree. The amount of students taking the exam does not appear to have an impact, as the highest and lowest pass rates are during periods where there are the most and least number of candidates.

The only significance we may be able to ascertain from this is that it is possible that the students taking the exam during the first and second quarters were full time students and they took their exams as the class was completed. A very interestingfact which is not mentioned above is that in 2007, on average pupils with a high school diploma passed at 87.9% ; baccalaureate degreed students 86.4%; and associate degreed students at 84.8%. Amazingly, students with a mere diploma had a higher passing rate.

The cause for this is that they have fewer distractions, and they have more time to study. Students with less responsibility are more likely to focus on what they have been taught, opposed to their counter parts, who must concentrate on the needs of their jobs and children.

It is challenging to make the time to learn for the NCLEX Exam with such responsibilities It is imperative to plan your time. If you haven’t started nursing classes yet, promptly take the time to decide when you will be able to study. Develop practical expectations. Consider what other activities you will have to give up. If you understand in advance what sacrifices you have to make and you communicate with those who depend on you, they will be more likely to support you.

Determine where you will study. This must be a location where you feel you can concentrate on your studies. Time that you spend focused only on your studies will be effective and take less time. Surprisingly, the auto is a great place to study and review what you have learned. Get NLEX audios and start listening to them. Since you have used your time more effectively, you will be able to reward yourself with some downtime. Take advantage of all the audio study guides. The more you listen to and learn, the less time you will be sitting down gaining weight.

Only careful planning and execution of all aspects of your studying and test preparation will help you pass the NCLEX exam. As mentioned above, it is not a matter of your prior education that will determine if you Pass the NCLEX, it is how you execute your plan for education.

NCLEX Exam Study Guide- Audios

- CF Thompson

Audio Learning Helps NCLEX Students in US and Abroad

According to NCSBN, National Council of State Boards of Nursing the gap between international students and US educated students passing the NCLEX RN is diminishing.

In 2000 there were a total of 71,475 US educated students and 7,506 internationally educated students taking the NCLEX RN. About 88.5% of students taking the NCLEX were educated in the United States

Although the number of nursing students increased significantly in 2007, it is not meeting the needs of the demands. An aging population, growing population, and nurses performing the tasks that were traditionally performed by doctors is causing a serious demand for nurses.

The demand for nurses in the US is being answered by students in other countries. Many United States Citizens are protesting that there are citizens with skills and experience to fill the positions in the computer science field and issuing more work visas will only increase unemployment in the US. Will nurses in the United States be competing for jobs in the United States with students educated abroad? Last year there were 119,579 US educated students and 33,768 internationally educated students sitting for the NCLEX RN test. This is a bit more than 28% of all nursing students sitting for this test.

The dramatic increase is quite possibly the result of the National Council of State Boards of Nursing opening three exam centers abroad. In just seven years the percentage of international students has risen 17.5%

Students educated outside the US are alert to the need for nurses in North America and know that educating themselves may be their opportunity to obtain a work visa and possible citizenship in the United States and may garner them a life of a greater quality of living and freedom from oppression.

US are still out performing international students, but international students are gaining on them.In 2007, there were 119,579 United States educated nursing students taking the NCLEX RN. 85.5% of them passed. Only 52% of the 33,768 internationally educated

How about those students who had to repeat the test? In 2007 26,411 students sat for the exam for at least the second time. These were United States educated students repeating the test. Simple math indicates that there are students taking the exam for at least the third time A mere 52.4% of these repeat test takers passed. Internationally educated test takers pass rate dropped to 25.7%

NCLEX Audio test prep materialsare available online. Since the audios are available online they are accessible to anyone in the world.

most students use the audios to study for the exam, but some students have thought ahead and use it to learn the class material prior to starting the class.

Students around the world find it difficult to make time to study. Audio study materials for the NCLEX exam make it easy to learn while doing other tasks.

NCLEX Exam Study Guide- Audios NCLEX Exam Study Guide- Audios

- CF Thompson

Finally An Osteoporosis Prescription That Will Help Inhibit Bone Loss

Amgen NASDAQ: AMGN pharmaceutical company just released information stating outstanding performance results for denosumab Pivotal Postmenopausal Osteoporosis Trial.

Trial reached primary endpoint of Diminishing new vertebral fractures and secondary endpoints of reducing time to first non-vertebral and hip fractures; adverse events similar to placebo. The past president of the National Osteoporosis Foundation Stated, ” I am particularly excited about these findings because they indicate that denosumab may offer an important new option for patients.”

Denosumab is the first fully human monoclonal antibody in late stage clinical development that particularly targets RANK Ligand, an essential regulator of osteoclasts the cells that break down bone). Denosumab is being considered for its potential to inhibit all stages of osteoclast activity through a targeted mechanism. Denosumab is being researched for a variety of bone loss conditions such as, postmenopausal osteoporosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and cancer treatment-induced bone loss in breast cancer and prostate cancer patients| in prostate cancer and breast cancer patients as well as for its potential to delay bone metastases and stop and treat bone destruction across many stages of cancer.

Osteoporosis is often referred to as the “silent epidemic”, osteoporosis is a world wide problem illness, which is growing in significance as the world population both increases and ages. WHO, The World Health Organization has recently claimed osteoporosis as a significant health issue in addition to other major non-communicable diseases. We are dependent on the pharmaceutical companies to help combat this terrible disease.

According to Amgen the economic burden of osteoporosis is referred to as the “silent epidemi’ to that of other major chronic diseases; for example, in the U.S. the costs associated with osteoporosis-related fractures are equivalent to those of cardiovascular disease and asthma (i)(ii)(iii). It has been reported that osteoporosis results in more hospital bed-days than stroke, myocardial infarction or breast cancer (iv).

Pharmacist-clinical have been researching prescriptions drugs to help patient that have serious side effects. These products are developed almost at the same time as the medications that aid in the treatment of the initial illness. The fact that research is available to help predict the possible effects and interactions drugs have with each other is outstanding.

These medicines are prescribed to prevent and treat osteoporosis. A few prescriptions increase bone thickness or slow the rate of bone loss. Even small amounts of new bone growth can reduce the danger of breaking bones. It is important that you take calcium and vitamin D, eat well and exercise when you take osteoporosis prescriptions.

pharmacist

- CF Thompson

A New Definition for Autism

Autism as classically defined was and is a devastating disorder. It was a severely incapacitating disability that was relatively rare. It occurred in approximately 1-2 infants per 10,000 births.

In this severe form of “Classic Autism” effective speech was absent. It could include symptoms of repetitive, highly unusual, aggressive and self-injurious behavior. Those afflicted had extremely abnormal ways of relating to people, objects, or events. Parents noticed that something was “not right” generally within the first three to six months of life. These children did not coo or smile. They resisted affection and did not interact normally.

In the last decade, another type of autism has surfaced that is often referred to as “Autistic Syndrome.” Children suffering from this disorder generally appear normal in the first 15-18 months of life. They do not present signs or symptoms pediatricians or neurologists would find atypical. These children create an inconsistency with previous held beliefs that 70-80% of autistic children are mentally retarded. They crawl, sit up, walk, and usually hit normal motor milestones on schedule. Up until the age of onset, they are affectionate and appear to have above average intelligence.

Children with this autistic syndrome may begin to develop some speech but then, without warning, cease to progress, or begin to regress. Suddenly, these children become withdrawn. They are quiet sometimes and hyper at other times. Often self-stimulatory behaviors (i.e. arm flapping, rocking, spinning, or head banging) develop. In time, some manifest symptoms that are both similar and atypical to children previously diagnosed as “classically autistic. “

While training as a pediatrician, I was told if I saw one autistic child in a lifetime of practice it would be one too many. What I am seeing today is not the autism I learned about in medical school twenty years ago. What was once a relatively rare disorder is now twenty times more likely to occur. Before, “autism” was 1-2 per 10,000 births. Now, current statistics suggest a frequency of 20 per 10,000 births (rates of 40 per 10,000 or higher have been suggested).

In the past, autism was considered a “psychiatric” disorder. We now know that autism is a medical condition, not a mental disorder. Perhaps one of the reasons no one has come up with an answer for autism is the way we have thought of it (or rather did not think of it in medicine).

Most “MD” researchers did not look for the answers to autism because they felt this was a disorder that was untreatable medically. Treatment for this affliction was primarily left in the hands of psychologists and a few psychiatrists.

“Autistic syndrome,” though still treated mainly by psychologists and psychiatrists, is also no longer considered a psychiatric disorder. It is a biological disorder that requires medical intervention. Physicians are now just beginning to understand the medical origins as well as the actual and potential treatments for autism.

Even though I believe children with classic autism might be helped medically as our knowledge of the brain’s physiology expands, for now it might be helpful to separate children afflicted with autistic syndrome from those with classic autism. As children with autistic syndrome increasingly become categorized as a “medical” problem, separating them from the many negative connotations and hopelessness associated with “classic” autism could be advantageous to promoting research and funding to help these children. The differences between the two groups may be summarized as follows:

Classic Autism
Generally “abnormal” early (i.e. 3 - 6 months of age)
“Classic” Autistic symptoms / presentation
Presumed “static,” / unchangeable


Autistic Syndrome
An increasing population of children with “Autistic/ PDD” behavioral characteristics
Current estimate 20-40 children / 10,000 (incidence may be as high as 1-5% of Does NOT have “objective” physical signs of neurologic damage / injury Majority (?? All) are immune mediated, appropriately looked upon as a medical dysfunction - open to potential medical therapyGenerally “normal” early (usually until 15 - 18 months of age) Atypical symptoms Asperger’s Landau Kleffner’s ADHD / ADD variants

A potentially progressive disorder (if not treated / corrected) May explain the origin of many cases of “Landau-Kleffner” syndrome.
Autism and the Immune System
I have been in clinical practice for the last twenty years. When my wife developed an “unknown” chronic illness in 1982, I began to explore and research neuro-cognitive dysfunction and immune dysfunction / dysregulation in an effort to help my wife. Eventually she was diagnosed with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, to what is now CFIDS (Chronic Fatigue Immune Dysfunction Syndrome).

The first suspicion I had that autism might be immune-related occurred in 1985. I was in the middle of exploring various alternative therapies in hopes of helping my wife and others afflicted with CFIDS. About the same time, some autistic children were referred to me for evaluation. These children had never had any blood work-ups because no one thought of their “problem” as a medical one. Much to my surprise, they had similar profiles on amino acid scr ns as the adults I
was seeing with CFIDS. I couldn’t help but wonder “What did Autism have to do with the immune system?”

Michael J. Goldberg M.D., F.A.A.P.
Avalar Medical Group, Inc.
5620 Wilbur Avenue, Suite 318
Tarzana, Claifornia 91356
Telephone (818) 343-1010
Fax (818) 343-6585

Pediatrics & Young Adults
ADHD/ADD-Learning Disabilities,
Immune Dysfunction Autism

Source: treatments

Medical Treatments for Autism and NIDS

Most of the children I see have healthy bodies with reactive and volatile immune systems. The first step, is to check functioning of various systems in the body. Unless another “medical” problem is found, the immune system is what is creating the misbalance / dysfunction in the brain.

Unfortunately, new, potentially safe immune modulators (steroids, IVGG, are old immune modulators, neither generally safe or effective with this type of immune disorder) are not yet available. Until these immune modulating drugs are scientifically tested in controlled studies, the way to help these children must focus on an overall approach using efforts / steps and medicines available now. By the time a child is referred to my office, their immune systems have not been functioning well for a very long time. This dysfunctional process did not occur overnight and it takes time to “cool” down / help “normalize” the body and the immune system.

The closer you can bring the body towards normal, the better the chance that the body may shut off this reactive and dysfunctional immune system. It is a difficult and complicated process to make the body heal itself especially after years of dysfunction. But if you remove some of the “offenders” that cause the immune system to fire when it shouldn’t, you’re making it easier for the body to normalize.

Michael J. Goldberg M.D., F.A.A.P.
Avalar Medical Group, Inc.
5620 Wilbur Avenue, Suite 318
Tarzana, Claifornia 91356
Telephone (818) 343-1010
Fax (818) 343-6585

Pediatrics & Young Adults
ADHD/ADD-Learning Disabilities,
Immune Dysfunction Autism

Source: immune

Autism Treatments - The Role of Allergens and Diet

I usually begin by testing the blood to determine allergies that could possibly trigger the immune system to react. Often autistic children come up allergic to a large number of foods, not necessarily because they are actually allergic, but rather because their immune systems are so “revved-up,” they react to everything.

This reaction may or may not occur as a traditional allergic reaction of asthma, a rash or hives. But what does occur is an immune mediated, abnormal “shut down” of blood flow in the brain that affect the language and social skills area of the brain and central nervous system function.

I generally start to improve the immune system by placing the patient on a diet free from dairy products, chocolate, and whole wheat. The reason for this is to help reduce the stress on the immune system. If dairy, chocolate and whole wheat are taken away, 96 - 98% of probable “food” allergies are alleviated. However, I do not believe that you can correct this condition by diet alone. If this were possible, parents (and physicians) by now, would have heard of multiple, “unbelievable” successes over the years. Reputable “institutions” would be conducting clinical trials to investigate the “successes.”

Since nutritional therapies have not resulted in cures, or even published reports of significantly improved cognitive function, it is illogical, in fact potentially detrimental, to put these children on extreme diets. However, sometimes these children put themselves on extreme diets by only eating a limited number of foods. I don’t think there are a lot of normal children who would be healthy on some of the diets these kids put themselves on.

For most of the children, all that is necessary is to eliminate the “main offenders” in their diets that will cause the immune system to react. It is not necessary to eliminate all wheat. Some doctors and homeopaths recommend the elimination of all gluten and wheat. I think these children show improvement because when they are put on a gluten / wheat free diet, they no longer eat whole wheat. Usually, all that is really needed is to eliminate whole wheat and other whole grains (due to allergenic potential) from the diet.

I do not normally focus on casein beyond eliminating the primary milk products. Because even though they may, in theory, play a slight role in the background, if the allergies overall are lowered, it will decrease the immune system firing off.

It does not matter if “allowed” processed products are used, as long as they do not appear to be a “trigger.” But, avoiding the “main” offenders is extremely important. Eliminating too many products from a child’s diet, increases the risk of disturbing a child’s metabolic balance, rather than helping to normalize it. (Note: Many supplements meant to compensate for the diet extremes, may in themselves have allergenic components, acting as negatives triggers to the immune system and the child overall. They may fail to be properly absorbed or contain dangerous impurities. Children may be at far greater risk from diet and “supplements” than any perceived risk from properly used pharmaceuticals.)

The G.I. tract is loaded with lymphocytes (white blood cells that fight infection and disease).Those lymphocytes communicate with the brain. What has always made sense and is “logical” is if the body is sensitive to milk protein and whole wheat protein, coming into the G.I. tract it could cause the immune system to fire.

As research evolved, it was found that milk and dairy can actually cause a microscopic blood loss in the intestine by a “reactive” inflammation of the bowel. It is interesting to note that most of the world’s populations get violently ill when given cow’s milk. Apparently, it’s not a normal human trait to digest the cow’s milk proteins.

Asian people have much healthier arteries than we do. One of the major assumptions for this is that they eat soy protein instead of dairy protein. Dairy is the number one source of cholesterol. The entire family can be helped indirectly if milk is eliminated from the meals. Parents often worry if their child is getting enough calcium. Soy and rice milk often have calcium and vitamins A and D added. However, if a child (girl or a boy) is eating a normal diet, they will get enough calcium.

In the teenage years, girl’s diets should be supplemented, if you’re not giving them a lot of dairy. But usually, this is not necessary in these first three or four months. As time goes on a calcium supplement may need to be added. Often I will suggest Tums®. Tums® are a very safe source of calcium for a child and they taste good. Inter-related is the fact that many children and adults who are sensitive to milk but still continue to drink milk products, often have iron stores that are low. Their Hgb. / Hct. are chronically on the low side of normal, even if they were not truly “anemic.” This is typically because of a microscopic blood loss occurring through this “inflamed” mucosa. If dairy and milk were eliminated from the diet, and then a biopsy of the intestine was done, the mucosa(the mucous membrane that lines a structure e.g. mouth and lips) would look normal. If milk and dairy were then reintroduced, the mucosa would look raw and inflamed. (Therefore, in approaching the idea of “leaky” gut, helping the body by removing negatives, is more important than “supplements” and nutritional “fixes.”)

As a pediatrician it has been fairly routine for me to see a child do well on formula (even a cow’s milk based one) for 12 months, but when the child is switched to real milk, the child experiences congestion, stuffiness, upset stomach, and a whole realm of symptoms not seen before. Whole protein, unprocessed food is much more allergenic and has a higher incidence of causing the immune system to react.

The truth is, there is not as bad an allergic reaction out of a processed product. When a food is processed, the protein structure is changed. So a child that might go berserk on milk… may not have a reaction to “processed” cheese. When the protein structure is changed, the food will not give as large an allergenic reaction.

Products from the health food stores are not necessarily the best for autistic children because they are less processed and more pure. They have a lot of whole wheat and grains. For these kids, the cheapest white bread (without milk, whole wheat, or whey) is often the best choice.

To illustrate how peculiar the immune system is, when parents seen the results of the food test come back, a routine phone call is, “How come you did not say ‘no eggs’?” You’ll almost always see egg white and egg yolk with very high numbers, and yet I will usually say “ignore it.” The reason being, unless a child has eczema where yolk or egg are triggering off a skin reaction, for some reason the immune pathway fired off by eggs doesn’t seem to play a role in what we are talking about in the brain. I rarely have to worry about taking a child off of eggs, even though you may have this “huge reaction” on the food “screen.” This illustrates how parents need to become aware of what doctors have known and “fought” about for years, there is no “perfect” food test / screen, results must always be interpreted in their clinical context. Too often, parents are being “guided” by interpretation of food and metabolic screens that do not have the capability to do what the parents wish. Many mistakes are potential being made, that may be “metabolically” and physiologically hurting these children.

Although processed food might give a lesser reaction, the importance of avoiding allergens cannot be stressed enough. In the beginning, it is especially important to avoid foods that might trigger the immune system. If the immune system is triggered, the body is affected for a minimum of a week to ten days (or longer). So it’s necessary to be particularly strict at the start of the treatment, when the goal is to cool down the immune system.

If it comes down to choosing a food (cheat) with milk or sugar, choose the sugar. From the sugar the child may get hyper for a few hours, but it wears out of their body relatively quickly. From milk protein or other allergens, the immune system can be affected for up to two - three weeks. However since sugar feeds yeast, it is a good practice to minimize sugars in general.

It is also important to encourage the children to eat more protein. This will help balance out their own amino acids, which in turn will help alleviate some of their problems. All these children need protein. It is also necessary to restrict the starches. Healthy breakfasts, lunches and dinners should be served.

Sometimes this process of restoring the immune system to normal can be very deceptive. The child is doing extremely well, and appears almost well or “cured” to a parent, when everything suddenly falls apart.

A child may appear to be well, but unless the body has shut off this process, they still have a reactive, volatile immune system in the background. Even if a child is functioning at a extremely high level, a child should not be regarded as “cured”, unless the immune system has truly returned to normal.

While a few rare children will actually outgrow this process, especially if you have taken steps to help normalize their bodies; realistically, it will probably take the advent and usage of new drugs that are immune modulators, to truly shut-off their dysregulated immune system.

This treatment needs to be thought of on a continuum. The closer the child gets to normal, the better the chance that the body may shut off this process. But unless you’ve gone that last little step, unless this process shuts off, it must be assumed that the immune system is still volatile and potentially reactive.

The only principle I have continued to find logical over the years, is the idea that I’m trying to just help a child “normalize” their body (and brain). Can I help them balance out their body? If I can change the diet, their own body can help balance itself. There continues to be no evidence in these children of any pre-existing, built-in enzyme or metabolic defect. Therefore, by focusing on the overall intake, encouraging more protein, less starch, a child’s body will help balance out and replace needed amino acids ( the building blocks of the body) and other nutrients.

With rare exceptions, I will never say don’t do something if you truly see a child do better and it’s safe, but in most cases I have found that you can get to the right point if you just think of it as cool down the body’s immune system, help “safely” where medically and nutritionally possible, and extremely important, avoid offenders or triggers. If a child is doing better and their allergy test said they were not allergic to apple, but you give them a drink of apple juice and the child is bouncing off the walls, it doesn’t matter what the test said, that child should not have apple juice. And this is the way parents have to work with their own child.

Until new immune modulators are tested and ready for use with patients, I regard each step of treatment as an attempt to help “cool-down” the immune system, and help the body “adjust” itself in a healthier manner. While the principles are becoming very consistent, each child (his/her body and brain) must be “individualized.”

Michael J. Goldberg M.D., F.A.A.P.
Avalar Medical Group, Inc.
5620 Wilbur Avenue, Suite 318
Tarzana, Claifornia 91356
Telephone (818) 343-1010
Fax (818) 343-6585

Pediatrics & Young Adults
ADHD/ADD-Learning Disabilities,
Immune Dysfunction Autism

Source: allergens

Atopic Dermatitis Treatment

Eczema, also called atopic dermatitis, is a chronic condition that affects the skin. This condition is not contagious; it cannot be passed from one person to another. The term dermatitis means inflammation of the skin. The term atopic involves a group of conditions where there is usually an inherited tendency to acquire other allergic conditions, such as asthma and hay fever. In eczema, the skin becomes unusually itchy. Scratching produces cracking, weeping clear fluid, redness, swelling, and finally, crusting and scaling. When some children suffering eczema grow older, their skin disease is alleviated or disappears completely, although their skin usually remains dry and easily irritated. In others, eczema continues to be an important problem in adulthood.

There are no recognized causes for eczema, but the condition seems to appear from a combination of genetic and environmental factors.

Children are more likely to acquire this condition if allergic conditions like asthma or hay fever affect, or have affected, one or both parents. While some individuals outgrow dermal symptoms, nearly three out of four children suffering eczema go on to acquire hay fever or asthma. Environmental elements can bring on symptoms of eczema at any time in people who have inherited the atopic condition trait.

Eczema is also associated with malfunction of the organism’s immune system: the system that identifies and helps fight viruses and bacteria that attack your organism. Scientists have found that patients suffering eczema have a deficient level of a cytokine protein that is essential to the healthy function of the organism’s immune mechanism and a high level of other cytokines that lead to allergic reactions. The immune mechanism can become confused and create dermatitis even in the absence of a major infection.

In the past, doctors thought that eczema was caused by an emotional disorder. We now know that emotional factors, such as stress, can worsen the condition, but they do not cause the condition.

Also, a wide variety of skin care solutions contain preservatives. People who are allergic to one of these preservatives can have either localized or widespread dermatitis. Antigen-avoidance lists that facilitate patient instruction about what products to avoid can be acquired from the manufacturers of patch test allergens. With these written guidelines alone, patients must read skin care solution labels carefully, searching for the names of their allergens as recognized by patch tests as well as for any synonyms and cross-reactors of these allergens. After the identification of an allergen, a nurse can play a vital role in helping patients understand their dermatitis and its treatment. Nurses are in a perfect position to spend time educating patients about how to uncover the sources of certain allergens and, subsequently, how to avoid them.

A new skin care product is our latest answer to eliminate blemishes and alleviate all kind of skin conditions. Made with natural ingredients, it guarantees no allergic reactions and no adverse side effects.

- Angelique Jodein

Autism and NIDS - Controlling Candida and Yeast

While taking the risk of opening a medical controversy, this author certainly believes there is a logical connection between yeast and a dysfunctional immune system. However, this theory is not yet widely accepted by the medical community, but over the last few years has become easier to talk about and “discuss”. Candida is a yeast-like fungus that is present in all our bodies. Presumably, yeast / Candida is in every normal G.I. tract. That is where the confusion begins.

Normally, a healthy immune system keeps the yeast in check. If the immune system is not working properly, the yeast have a chance to overgrow and become a problem. Yeast is one of the likely pathogens contributing to a metabolic imbalance that is a secondary result of a dysfunctional / dysregulated immune system. It is NOT the primary reason or cause for autism.

There is logic in saying that if an immune system is dysregulated, a secondary problem potentially due to Candida needs to be treated. Some doctors hypothesize that autism is caused by a “leaky gut.” With this theory comes the assumptions that withdrawing allergens and treating a yeast overgrowth, will help the GI tract to return toward normal. The problem with this thinking is that if yeast is not the cause of autism or PDD, then treating Candida is not going to end the autistic or PDD state. I believe it is only one of the many steps needed to help normalize the body.

Many children afflicted with autism have had frequent ear infections as young children and have taken excessive amounts of antibiotics. This has exasperated the yeast problem in these children. Other possible contributors to Candida overgrowth are hormonal treatments (i.e. steroids, BCP pills, ?? secondary exposure), immunosuppresant drug therapy, exposure to herpes, chicken pox, or other “chronic” viruses, or exposure to chemicals that might upset the immune system. There is an increased probability, that a “general” environmental factor affecting our immune systems (i.e. ozone layer depletion, “toxic” chemicals, etc.) may be operative, affecting many children and adults.

Because it is impossible and not practical to expect anyone to stay on a totally yeast-free diet, ongoing medication, anti-fungal supplements, and avoidance of dietary negatives are necessary to control Candida. Even with the use of anti-fungal drugs, it is still important to limit sugar when there is a yeast problem, because yeast grows 200 times faster in the presence of sugar.

If a potent anti-fungal such as Diflucan or Nizoral is used, it can be assumed that within 1 - 2 months most all of the yeast will die off. I do not use Nilstat or Nystatin. For most children Nystatin is ineffective. And yeast, like bacteria with antibiotics, have become resistant to Nilstat (and other antifungals).

Usually, I will use Nizoral or Diflucan for about four to six months while trying to alleviate other stresses on the immune system and “maximize” a child’s function. In 7- 12 days some patients experience “die off.” This is the only time, a “negative” reaction to a medication can be a good sign.

When the yeast is being killed one experiences either a “sensitization” reaction to “products” of the yeast being killed, or there is release of “formaldehyde” like products or other potentially toxic derivatives, that can contribute to negative symptoms in a patient, including bouncing off the walls, miserable, and irritated. I know it is ironic, because it actually is a good sign that the child has a yeast problem that can be corrected with medication.

It is important that the parents check in during “die-off” so I can be sure what is occurring is indeed die-off and not a reaction to the medication. Die-off usually lasts about 7-14 days and after that time the change in the child can be rather dramatic. If the die-off does not end in 14 - 17 days, it is generally a reason to change choice of anti-fungal.

If the treatment is successful, usually eye-contact improves. The children seem more tuned in and less “foggy.” Parents report that after the yeast is under control the frequency of inappropriate noises, teeth grinding, biting, hitting, hyperness, and aggressive behavior decrease. The children no longer act almost drunk by being silly and laughing inappropriately.

While on Nizoral or Diflucan, I have the patient take monthly blood tests to monitor liver function before any damage might occur. I tend to be on the cautious side, “officially” testing is recommended every 2 - 3 months.

I change medication at six months, though in theory one could go longer. The reason I stop at six months is because Nizoral has a very mild effect on the adrenocortical axis. It’s part of the internal steroid mechanism. While this may even be part of how “Nizoral” helps the body, it also limits how long one should be on Nizoral. Generally, I will try to switch to Amphotericin B, which has recently been licensed as an oral liquid in this country, can now be legally compounded by certain pharmacies in the U.S.

If the antifungal therapy is stopped completely, and the body’s immune system has not returned to normal, the yeast will return. Ultimately, the key is the body’s own ability to keep in check an organism that it doesn’t want to have there to start with.

Some doctors mistakenly give medication to control the yeast for only a few weeks or even a month. Then the treatment is stopped because the child is doing better. The problem with this kind of therapy is that if a child is helped for a short time and then the treatment is withdrawn, the yeast is going to come back, perhaps even as a stronger, more resistant strain. Whereas if the treatment took that child to normal, and their immune system became normal, it would be possible to withdraw all treatment and the child would remain healthy.

Michael J. Goldberg M.D., F.A.A.P.
Avalar Medical Group, Inc.
5620 Wilbur Avenue, Suite 318
Tarzana, Claifornia 91356
Telephone (818) 343-1010
Fax (818) 343-6585

Pediatrics & Young Adults
ADHD/ADD-Learning Disabilities,
Immune Dysfunction Autism

Source: General

Next Page »